Secret Scriptures Revealed: Thoughts on Writing for Non-Specialists, Part 4
The final chapter of SSR is titled “Myths, Misconceptions, and Misinformation about the Christian Apocrypha.” It is a distillation of my previous work on the conflict between liberal scholarship on the Christian Apocrypha and its apologetic critics, a conflict occasioned by the publication of Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code and news of several subsequent discoveries of apocryphal texts (the Gospel of Judas, the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife, and the recent surge of interest in Secret Mark). But liberal scholars have propagated their own “myths, misconceptions, and misinformation,” and I spend time responding to these also. The discussion is arranged as responses to ten statements:
1. The Christian Apocrypha were all written after the texts of the New Testament, or
2. The Christian Apocrypha were all written before the texts of the New Testament.
3. The Christian Apocrypha are “forgeries,” written in the name of apostles.
4. The Christian Apocrypha were written by Gnostics.
5. The Christian Apocrypha claim that Jesus was not divine.
6. The Christian Apocrypha are bizarre and fanciful compared to the canonical gospels.
7. The Christian Apocrypha were written to undermine or replace the canonical texts.
8. The Christian Apocrypha were enormously popular before their suppression by a powerful minority in the Church.
9. The Christian Apocrypha are being used to rewrite Christian history.
10. Reading the Christian Apocrypha is harmful to one’s faith.
Many of these statements have been addressed in previous blog posts (begin HERE) from the time I was …