Skip to content

Apocryphicity

  • About
  • Tony Burke’s Homepage
  • Contact Tony

Apocryphicity

A Blog Devoted to the Study of Christian Apocrypha

Christian Apocrypha at the 2014 CSBS/CSPS

April 2, 2014 by Tony

For a few years now I have been organizing an informal session at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society of Biblical Studies on Christian Apocrypha. This year's session is in partnership with the Canadian Society of Patristic Studies. The annual meetings for both societies take place May 24 to 26 at Brock University in St. Catherines, Ontario. Here are the details:

Sunday 8:30-11:45 (Rm 211)
APOCRYPHA – A Co-Sponsored Session with the Canadian Society of Patristics
Presided by: Timothy Pettipiece (Carleton University)

8:30-9:00 Anna Cwikla (University of Toronto) “The Dialogue of the Saviour and the Synoptic Gospels”
Other than the Gospel of Thomas, Nag Hammadi texts are rarely considered in scholarship concerning the literary relationship to the Synoptic Gospels. The initial work on the Dialogue of the Saviour in the 1970s argued that it shows no certain dependence on any NT writings. Although this thesis has slowly fallen out of favour, the initial literary outline proposed by Helmut Koester and Elaine Pagels continues to obscure more in-depth source criticism. By shifting away from these artificially imposed gridlines, previously unexplored parallels to the Synoptic Gospels become evident, thus making the case that DialSav should receive more attention in this discourse.

9:00-9:30 Callie Callon (University of Toronto) “Physiognomy as a component of characterization in the Acts of Peter”
Ancient physiognomic thought held that the body and soul were intrinsically related, and that observation of a subject’s physical appearance provided insight into his or her character. Beyond being a diagnostic tool, however, physiognomy could also be used as a strategy of persuasion to bolster or malign an individual’s character to an author or speaker’s audience. The use of physiognomics to praise or denigrate was not restricted solely to actual personal interactions, but, as Elizabeth Evans has demonstrated, was often employed by authors of narrative works to aid in their characterizations of their story’s protagonists and antagonists. I propose that much like contemporaneous narratives in antiquity the Acts of Peter utilizes physiognomic commonplaces to reinforce its positive portrayal of Peter and its negative depiction of Simon.

9:30-10:00 Bradley N. Rice (McGill University) “Jesus the Gadfly: Introducing the Dialogue of the Paralytic with Christ”
The Dialogue of the Paralytic with Christ offers one of the most provocative portrayals of Jesus outside the Infancy Gospel of Thomas. Unflinching in its depiction of Jesus as a wayward troublemaker and intractable disbeliever, Dial. Paralytic was unknown to scholars of Christian apocrypha until relatively recently. In my paper I will offer an introduction to the Armenian and Georgian versions of Dial. Paralytic, which I am presently preparing for the forthcoming More Christian Apocrypha volume (ed. Tony Burke and Brent Landau). I will then explore the textual relationship that Dial. Paralytic seems to share with the Armenian Infancy Gospel in order to shed light on the obscure origins of this singular apocryphon.

10:00-10:15 Break

10:15-10:45 John Horman, "Translation Matters”
Our Coptic translation has skewed our understanding of the Gospel of Thomas. Because it was found in a collection of documents translated into Coptic, and because at first its relation to three papyri fragments was not at first recognized, it became customary to refer to it as the “Coptic Gospel of Thomas” as if the accidental fact of its having been translated into Coptic was part of its very essence. This, however, as Goodacre notes, falsifies out understanding of Thomas. I will in this paper probe this falsification under several headings. First, literary relationships are obscured. For example, when in Th. 4:2 the Coptic translator omitted the words “and the last first”, he obscured the fact that for this saying Thomas has a literary relationship with Mark and not with Q. Second, Thomas’ meaning is concealed. In the introduction, the Coptic translator has introduced a copula where very probably none was intended. In Th. 68,9 the translator has repositioned a negative, making what was originally a clear statement into mystifying nonsense. Third, relations between sayings are garbled. For example, the translator has obscured the connection between Th. 36 and Th. 37, and between Th. 7 and 8. Fourth, in some cases the translator simply had no idea what the Greek text was about. For example, in Th. 2, he replaced a carefully constructed sentence with a Stoic platitude. In Th. 60 he simply gave up and wrote “this is about the lamb”. Finally, much of Thomas has been omitted by the translator. For example, the translator has omitted the bulk of Th. 30 and Th. 36.

10:45-11:15 Robert A. Kitchen (Knox-Metropolitan United Church) “The Syriac History of Philip”
The text is notable in its title as it is an apocryphal history of the apostle Philip, not a gospel. It is a translation into Syriac (manuscript dated 1569) from a Greek text which has not been preserved. The History begins at the moment Philip lands in Azotus, transported from the wilderness road in Acts 8:40. The author/translator relies on motifs from Acts and the Old Testament prophesies and interpretations of the Messiah. Christ once again appears to Philip in a vision with a commission to go to Carthage and remove a satanic ruler, which he will effect simply by crossing himself as he enters the palace. Philip and company are transported to Carthage on a ship via almost-warp speed, a dolphin and a talking ox are employed for divine service, and an unusual resurrection. Essentially, the History is an anti-Jewish polemic in which a Jewish bystander, Hananya, is successively the anti-hero, convert, martyr and resurrected one. The sermons and testimonies are replete with anachronistic knowledge of Christian Messianic interpretations, as well as prophetic condemnations of unfaithful Israel. This paper will focus upon the function of this early Greek text in a later Syriac environment.

11:15-11:45 Questions and Discussion

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Special issue of JSNT on Gospel of Thomas

Next Post:

Gospel of Jesus’ Wife Declared Authentic

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

Archives

  • September 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • May 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • August 2021
  • May 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006

Categories

  • 2007 Apocrypha Workshop
  • 2010 Acts of Pilate workshop
  • 2013 CSBS
  • 2014 CSBS/CSPS
  • 2015 Gnosticism Course
  • 2018 NTA Course
  • 2020 BASONOVA lecture
  • Abgar Correspondence
  • Acts of Philip
  • Acts of Thomas
  • Acts of Titus
  • AELAC
  • After Jesus
  • Anchor Yale Bible Reference Library
  • Anne Rice
  • Anti-CA Apologetic
  • Apocalypse of Peter
  • Apocalypses of John
  • Apocrypha Collections
  • Apocrypha Journal
  • Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles
  • Apocryphal Gospels
  • Apostolic Lists
  • Armenian Apocrypha
  • Art
  • Assumption/Dormition
  • Bart Ehrman
  • Beyond Canon
  • Bible Hunters
  • Bible Secrets Revealed
  • Biblical Archaeology Review
  • Birth of Jesus
  • Book of the Rolls
  • Book Reviews
  • CA in Ancient Libraries
  • CA sites
  • CA Web Sites
  • Call for Papers
  • Canon Formation
  • Christ Files
  • Christian Apocrypha
  • Church Slavonic
  • CNN Finding Jesus
  • Conferences
  • CSBS/CSPS Christian Apocrypha
  • Da Vinci Code
  • Death of Judas by Papias
  • Deir a-Surian Monastry
  • Dialogue of the Paralytic with Christ
  • Dissertations
  • Doctrine of Addai
  • Dormition of the Virgin
  • ECA Series
  • Encomium 12 Apostles
  • Erasure History 2011
  • Erotapokriseis
  • Ethiopic Apocrypha
  • Expository Times Volume
  • Fabricating Jesus
  • Forgotten Gospels
  • Francois Bovon
  • Funeral of Jesus
  • Gnosticism
  • Gospel Fragments
  • Gospel of Jesus' Wife
  • Gospel of Judas
  • Gospel of Mary
  • Gospel of Nicodemus
  • Gospel of Peter
  • Gospel of the Savior
  • Gospel of the Twelve Apostles
  • Gospel of Thomas
  • Gregory of Tours
  • HMML
  • Hospitality of Dysmas
  • Infancy Gospel of Thomas
  • Infancy Gospels
  • Inventing Christianity Series
  • Irish Apocrypha
  • Jesus in Egypt
  • Jesus Tomb
  • Jewish-Christian Gospels
  • John the Baptist
  • Joseph and Aseneth
  • Judas Apocryphon
  • Letter of Lentulus
  • Letter to the Laodiceans
  • Life of John the Baptist
  • manuscripts
  • Many Faces of Christ
  • Martyrium of Cornelius
  • Material of Christian Apocrypha
  • Medieval Apocrypha
  • Modern Apocrypha
  • Montreal Conference
  • More New Testament Apocrypha
  • MOTP
  • Nag Hammadi Library
  • NASSCAL
  • NASSCAL Conferences
  • nativity story
  • Old Testament Pseudepigrapha
  • On-line CA books
  • Ottawa Workshop
  • Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Apocrypha
  • Paul and Resurrection
  • Pilate Cycle
  • Pilgrimage
  • Protoevangelium of James
  • Ps.-Cyril on the Passion
  • Pseudo-Memoirs of the Apostles
  • Rediscovering Apocryphal Continent
  • Regensburg
  • Revelation of the Magi
  • SBL Christian Apocrypha Section
  • Schoyen gospel
  • Secret Lives of Jesus
  • Secret Mark
  • Secret Scriptures Revealed
  • Slavonic Apocrypha
  • Studies in Christian Apocrypha
  • Sybilline Oracles
  • Syriac
  • Syriac Life of Mary
  • Tabloid Apocrypha
  • The Aquarian Gospel
  • The Halo Effect
  • The Lost Years
  • The Messiah
  • Tischendorf
  • Uncategorized
  • Vatican Passion gospel fragment
  • Wedgewood
  • Women
  • York Christian Apocrypha
© 2024 Apocryphicity | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes