Skip to content

Apocryphicity

  • About
  • Tony Burke’s Homepage
  • Contact Tony

Apocryphicity

A Blog Devoted to the Study of Christian Apocrypha

Reflections on the Secret Mark Symposium, part 1

May 9, 2011 by Tony

Now that a week or so has gone by since the Secret Mark Symposium, I think I’m ready to gather my thoughts about the event. Admittedly, much of it is a blur as I had to focus so much on the mechanics of the symposium, that I found it difficult to concentrate on the presentations and discussions. But I will begin with some comments on the planning and execution of the event.

The process began over a year ago with a series of e-mail exchanges between me and scholars Peter Jeffery and Allan Pantuck. We worked together to determine who would be the best scholars to contribute papers to the event. We tried to achieve a balance of perspectives, with a morning session aimed at presenting arguments for and against Secret Mark’s authenticity, and an afternoon session with other perspectives on the text (e.g., where it fits in, or not, with the works of Clement of Alexandria). The plan also was to invite only North American scholars—both due to budgetary restraints and to my long-term goal to support North American CA scholarship—and, ideally, those who had published a monograph or substantial article on the text. We had some prospective participants decline our invitations, some simply because of scheduling conflicts, some for no stated reason. In the end, we were happy with the group we assembled, and pleased that they had faith in us to accept our invitations to participate. Nevertheless, people have noted particularly the glaring absence of Stephen Carlson from the event; rest assured, he was invited.

Throughout September to December my colleague Phil Harland and I worked on securing funding for the event. Government arts funding was not an option for us, as they do not fund conferences by first-time conveners; so, we were restricted to internal funding. We ended up obtaining around $9000 from various university departments and grants. By January we knew the conference was a go, but we would have to be careful in our spending.

We scheduled the symposium for a date between the end of exams and the start of Spring session, primarily so that the participants would be finished with classes and grading and not yet heading off to other conferences and for vacations. The only problem with that decision is that many of York’s restaurant facilities were either completely closed for the week or on reduced hours. That made it difficult for finding a venue for a small reception the night before the symposium, a dinner for the presenters the next day, and a location for a celebratory drink at the end of the event. We also failed to order enough coffee and snacks for the day. We dealt with the problems as best we could, and certainly have learned some lessons for next time. I hope these didn’t colour everyone’s perceptions of the event too much—is it like a wedding, where all anyone remembers is the music and the food?

Another wrinkle occurred in the scheduling of the day. The goal was to have a day-long event with two sessions of papers and a more-casual evening event at which a few participants could answer some prepared questions and field questions from a wider audience—i.e., not just scholars and students. Unfortunately, we did not attract a large number of “outsiders” to the evening discussion; and those who did attend had been with us all day (such troopers!). Who would have thought 12 hours of Secret Mark could be too much for some people?   We were extremely pleased with the turnout for the day sessions, but if we want to mount an evening session again, we will need to work further on promotion, and also spread the sessions out over more than one day—which was the plan if we secured more funding in future years.

The next stage in the planning of the symposium is to publish the papers. We are considering some options for this and will pass on word when we have firm plans. We need also to think about next year’s symposium and would like to hear what suggestions you may have for a topic and other feedback you may have to help us mount future symposia.

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Secret Mark Symposium: A Student’s View

Next Post:

Reflections on the Secret Mark Symposium, part 2

2 Commments

  1. Mark Goodacre says:
    May 9, 2011 at 3:30 pm

    I am looking forward to reading more about the symposium. Thanks for the reports for those of us who would have liked to have been there. It sounds like your schedule is somewhat different from ours. Far from it being “between the end of exams and the start of Spring session”, for us 29 April was right in the heart of our exam / grading / end of semester rush.

  2. Tommy Wasserman says:
    May 10, 2011 at 9:30 am

    More at the ETC blog: http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/2011/05/report-on-secret-gospel-of-mark_10.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

Archives

  • September 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • May 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • August 2021
  • May 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006

Categories

  • 2007 Apocrypha Workshop
  • 2010 Acts of Pilate workshop
  • 2013 CSBS
  • 2014 CSBS/CSPS
  • 2015 Gnosticism Course
  • 2018 NTA Course
  • 2020 BASONOVA lecture
  • Abgar Correspondence
  • Acts of Philip
  • Acts of Thomas
  • Acts of Titus
  • AELAC
  • After Jesus
  • Anchor Yale Bible Reference Library
  • Anne Rice
  • Anti-CA Apologetic
  • Apocalypse of Peter
  • Apocalypses of John
  • Apocrypha Collections
  • Apocrypha Journal
  • Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles
  • Apocryphal Gospels
  • Apostolic Lists
  • Armenian Apocrypha
  • Art
  • Assumption/Dormition
  • Bart Ehrman
  • Beyond Canon
  • Bible Hunters
  • Bible Secrets Revealed
  • Biblical Archaeology Review
  • Birth of Jesus
  • Book of the Rolls
  • Book Reviews
  • CA in Ancient Libraries
  • CA sites
  • CA Web Sites
  • Call for Papers
  • Canon Formation
  • Christ Files
  • Christian Apocrypha
  • Church Slavonic
  • CNN Finding Jesus
  • Conferences
  • CSBS/CSPS Christian Apocrypha
  • Da Vinci Code
  • Death of Judas by Papias
  • Deir a-Surian Monastry
  • Dialogue of the Paralytic with Christ
  • Dissertations
  • Doctrine of Addai
  • Dormition of the Virgin
  • ECA Series
  • Encomium 12 Apostles
  • Erasure History 2011
  • Erotapokriseis
  • Ethiopic Apocrypha
  • Expository Times Volume
  • Fabricating Jesus
  • Forgotten Gospels
  • Francois Bovon
  • Funeral of Jesus
  • Gnosticism
  • Gospel Fragments
  • Gospel of Jesus' Wife
  • Gospel of Judas
  • Gospel of Mary
  • Gospel of Nicodemus
  • Gospel of Peter
  • Gospel of the Savior
  • Gospel of the Twelve Apostles
  • Gospel of Thomas
  • Gregory of Tours
  • HMML
  • Hospitality of Dysmas
  • Infancy Gospel of Thomas
  • Infancy Gospels
  • Inventing Christianity Series
  • Irish Apocrypha
  • Jesus in Egypt
  • Jesus Tomb
  • Jewish-Christian Gospels
  • John the Baptist
  • Joseph and Aseneth
  • Judas Apocryphon
  • Letter of Lentulus
  • Letter to the Laodiceans
  • Life of John the Baptist
  • manuscripts
  • Many Faces of Christ
  • Martyrium of Cornelius
  • Material of Christian Apocrypha
  • Medieval Apocrypha
  • Modern Apocrypha
  • Montreal Conference
  • More New Testament Apocrypha
  • MOTP
  • Nag Hammadi Library
  • NASSCAL
  • NASSCAL Conferences
  • nativity story
  • Old Testament Pseudepigrapha
  • On-line CA books
  • Ottawa Workshop
  • Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Apocrypha
  • Paul and Resurrection
  • Pilate Cycle
  • Pilgrimage
  • Protoevangelium of James
  • Ps.-Cyril on the Passion
  • Pseudo-Memoirs of the Apostles
  • Rediscovering Apocryphal Continent
  • Regensburg
  • Revelation of the Magi
  • SBL Christian Apocrypha Section
  • Schoyen gospel
  • Secret Lives of Jesus
  • Secret Mark
  • Secret Scriptures Revealed
  • Slavonic Apocrypha
  • Studies in Christian Apocrypha
  • Sybilline Oracles
  • Syriac
  • Syriac Life of Mary
  • Tabloid Apocrypha
  • The Aquarian Gospel
  • The Halo Effect
  • The Lost Years
  • The Messiah
  • Tischendorf
  • Uncategorized
  • Vatican Passion gospel fragment
  • Wedgewood
  • Women
  • York Christian Apocrypha
© 2024 Apocryphicity | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes